The Budyonnovsk hospital hostage crisis was American Retaliation for the Oklahoma City Bombing

The United States and Russia have been engaged in a proxy war since the Fall of the Soviet Union. The United States ran their armies right up to the borders of Russia and sponsored Nazi terrorists to kill Russians in Chechnya. The major attacks against America in the 90's were sponsored by Russia. 

ISLAMIC TERRORISM AND WE DID IT TO OURSELVES ARE THE COVER FOR RUSSIAN ATTACKS ON THE USA

Looking back 6 years from 11 September 2001. We see the same cover story being used for the OKC bombing that we would later see being used for 9-11. In this video the claim is made that OKC was a controlled demolition. It is also notable blame was first put on Islamic terrorists as well. They decided to go for the we did it to ourselves meme to explain what happened. This would be the same meme used in the 9-11 event. 9-11 was not an Islamic Terrorist event. It was Russian retaliation to American provocations in and around their territory. 

OKC was a suitcase nuke attack on the United States by Russia. 

In order to get out ahead of journalists who would see the inconsistencies of the official version. They had to explain how a bomb that could not have destroyed the Murrah Building did so. So, the government uses people like Col. Gritz to steer people in the direction and narrative they want them to believe. Initially the narrative was going to be that Islamic Jihad was the culprit for the bombing. The trouble with this narrative is that in April 1995, the Russian General Lebed had recently claimed that Chechen terrorists had recently acquired man portable nuclear weapons. The OKC blast was in the neighborhood of 40 tons of TNT. 40 tons is on the lower end of the spectrum of man portable nuclear weapons. The Soviets began prepositioning man portable nuclear weapons inside the United States sometime in the 1960's. So, the Islamic terrorist explanation had to be abandoned in order to prevent people from drawing the conclusion that a suitcase nuclear weapon had been used. 

When Lebed made his claims of loose nuclear weapons what he was really making a veiled threat that he intended to attack the United States. This attack came on 19 April 2017. The internal logic of Lebed's narrative does not hold water. It is highly unlikely that anyone could make it out of an armory with a suitcase nuclear weapon in hand. Also the Chechen terrorists were supported by the CIA. So, Lebed was saying that CIA supported terrorists would give Bin Laden also a CIA supported terrorist nuclear weapons to attack the United States. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. It is a bit much to believe. The timing of the OKC bombing suggests that a cached man portable nuclear weapon was used. The Russians showed us that they can attack within the center of the Continental United States CONUS. 

AMERICANS MURDERED GENERAL LEBED?

OKC and 911 were Russian attacks on the United States in response to American actions in Chechnya. General Lebed was the architect of these attacks.

Playing this card shows that 9-11 was not Bin Laden. 

General Lebed dies 28 days after an S-IVB third stage from an Apollo mission left its heliocentric orbit near L1 to orbit the Earth. This third stage designated J002E3 was first reported in the press on the anniversary of 9-11. In response to American actions in Chechnya Lebed had made thinly veiled threats of suitcase nuke attacks against the United States in the 1990’s. The War Colleges in America had been writing articles and papers on the prospect of super terrorist attacks not long after the fall of the Soviet Union. Beginning in the middle of the 1960's the prospect of a man portable nuclear weapons attack on America was taken seriously. The Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) was established sometime in the middle of the1970’s. Meaning that Soviet deployment of these weapons within the Continental United States (CONUS) took place sometime during this period. Lebed was threatening to use these weapons in response to American actions in Chechnya. The Russian attack on the USA did not use suitcase nuclear weapons. They used airplanes

Actually they did use airplanes. 

HOW THE USA TOOK DOWN THE SOVIET UNION

There were two cloak and dagger factors that brought down the Soviet Union. The Soviets were attacked internally by the Gehlen network of stay behind spies who remained in the Soviet Union as the Nazi Army retreated from the USSR. This was the cloak. The cloak was paired with the dagger of being militarily contained at its borders and in space. The Gehlen Network played a big role in destabilizing the country. The network played a role recently in Ukraine helping to overthrow the legitimate government. 

http://thearea51blog.blogspot.com/2015/09/hanger-18-is-where-nuclear-powered.html

RW BUSSARD'S PRESCIENT VIEWS ON OIL.

As for energy companies "stampeding" to support us -- It is clear that a view like this is ignorant of the reality of energy companies. There is only one thing the oil companies want, and that is to sell oil, and more oil. So long as the fields pump, the oil companies will squeeze. They have NO, absolutely NO interest in anything new, ins spite of all their foolish ads in magazines for wind mills and solar-PV roofs. It is all just show and tell. I know these guys, and there is no way they would support anything that might get in the way of oil. The only way to stop oil, from their view, is when it does run out. And then they''ll go for deeper drilling, new fields, Gulf geopressure gas, LNG, etc, etc, and keep raising the price, until finally foolish solar and windmills become competitive.
And we are paying the equivalent of $ 500/bbl oil costs. But Exxon and Halliburton are getting richer all the time.
Yes, we would like to build the demo plant, and yes, it will cost about 150 (DD) to 200 M (pB11), and who knows if any investor singly or a group can or will come up with the money. One of the biggest obstacle is the world-wide tokamak lobby, which perpetuates the fraud that Hirsch, Trivelpiece and I foisted on the country in the 1970's when we started the big tokamak ball rolling.
Magnetic confinement fusion is a misnomer, as magnetic fields can NOT confine a plasma, only constrain its motion towards walls. The entire history of the MagConf program has been to reduce transport to neo-classical (not turbulent or instability-driven) losses. And THEN the machines are all inherently and inevitably huge and cost too much and make too much power to ever be economically useful --- as the utilities have been telling the AEC/DoE for 30 years. No matter, the global tokamak program provides jobs for hundreds of thousands of people in many countries, and is a safe place to put political pork funding, simply because it IS NO THREAT TO OIL - it won't ever work, but it sounds good to the untutored public.

.......

I believe that the survival of our high-tech civilizations depends on getting off of fossile fuels ASAP, and - if we do not - we will descend into a growing series of "oil wars" and energy confrontations that can lead only to a huge cataclysim. Which CAN be circumvented if only we build the clean fuison machines in time. Our patents are in final form, and I am giving a paper in the Fall, and trying to get a large technical description together for a major paper by summer. We shall see.
One final word: Actually our device is really not a variant of Farnwworth/Hirsch, but of Elmore/Tuck/Watson who propeosed the inversion of Farnsworth/Hirsch long ago (ca. 1967). Their problem was the interception of circulating electrons by grids - we removed the grids and replaced them by B field insulated coils - thus our "grids" are the coils themselves.. And we do know how these work, at last.

http://www.rexresearch.com/bussard/bussard.htm

AN ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS

The so called liberals in this country need to get behind President Roosevelt's proposal for an economic bill of rights. The problem is that the Democratic Party in America stands for nothing. The need to show the world that they actually stand for something and will expand upon what has traditionally made them "liberal" namely the New Deal and Great Society programs of the 20th Century.

AUTHORITARIANISM AND PROFESSIONALISM

One sign that you are living in a totalitarian / authoritarian society is the existence of professionals. The profession that most associated with totalitarianism is that of lawyer. In the ancient democratic state of Athens there were no lawyers. Every citizen had the responsibility of knowing the law. In totalitarian states the laws are purposefully Byzantine in order to repress the people. The lay citizen is ignorant of the majority of the laws, yet is expected to adhere to the law. The United States was founded on the constitution of Rome. There were some tweaks but this is more or less the truth. The Roman Constitution was instituted in order to protect the institution of slavery. It is a constitutional oligarchic system. It is the antithesis of freedom. More to come....