"The Assad Regime is a Moral Disgrace": Noam Chomsky on Ongoing Syrian War

Chomsky clearly supports the Syrian Intervention. He has supported American Military interventions into Yugoslavia in the 1990's. Chomsky is old enough and educated enough to know how these interventions are done. The Syrian intervention has followed the same script America has been using since the days of the OSS. America inserts Special Forces soldiers and arms into a country. The Special Forces soldiers train locals to use the weapons and lead them to overthrow the government. The U.S. did this all over Western Europe in during WW2. They parachuted arms and OSS soldiers into Western Europe to fight the Nazis. The French Resistance is the most famous example of this. During the Cold War America stuck to the script using it all over the world in counter insurgency or what Special Forces calls Foreign Internal Defense (FID). The Bay of Pigs is the most infamous example of this strategy. I suggest that anyone reading this peruse the CIA documents on the Bay of Pigs. The script for running these kind of interventions is revealed there.

Chomsky’s authority as a “dissident” is being used to justify the American takeover of Syria. When he calls Assad’s regime “moral disgrace” without giving the pertinent background facts as to why there is a civil war, he is supporting American hegemony in the region. Also Chomsky is a farce. He represents the pale of respectable opinion in America. The American Ruling Class control over the media is totalitarian in nature. Chomsky is clearly a CIA asset/agent. Not only does his stands on key issues make this clear the company he keeps says it as well. He is friends with former CIA Director John M. Deutch.  The fact that he kept his job at MIT also speaks to this fact. If Chomsky were a real threat he would have been gone long ago. There is a long history of intellectuals being used by the CIA/OSS. Philosophers like Bertrand Russell and AJ Ayer worked for the CIA in the 1940’s. They were part of the Non-Communist Left that the CIA cultivated during the Cold War. Chomsky a self-described “anarchist” clearly falls into this class. So, know when you are listening to Chomsky, you are listening to a CIA agent, who has been groomed and cultivated to be your official lefty dissident. His perception as being left gives him persuasive power not only over others that like him but even more over the people that hate him. The conservatives that listen to him are even more persuaded of Assad’s immorality having heard Chomsky deride the man.

Democracy Now and Radio Pacifica are also CIA; they receive money from the same corporations that fund the mainstream media. Except they get it through the backdoor of their “philanthropic foundations.” These foundations are used to cloak CIA funding. Amy Goodman and Alan Nairn made their bones covering East Timor. Nairn has admitted publicly that in order to save his life at the hand of his Indonesian captors. He revealed to them that he is an Office of Naval Intelligence Officer. Intelligence Officers work in pairs or teams which means that Goodman is also an agent.

The CIA is a big tent organization (just don’t be a communist). Chomsky, Goodman and Nairn are a testament to that. So, don’t be fooled when you watch Democracy Now, know that you are watching the "left-wing" mouth pieces of our totalitarian ruling class. Assad’s self-defense casus belli is just. And Chomsky should know that. Instead he chooses to support American Intervention in Syria. 

Suitcase Nukes and the case for the American / Russian proxy war

The suitcase nuclear weapons story shows there is a proxy war. The Americans started the war in the 70's using Afghan and Iranian muslims to overthrow their governments. No doubt that two can play that game. The Russians now have their proxies as well.

The 1970's saw the creation in America of the Nuclear Emergency Search Team. This secret team was tasked with preventing suitcase nuke and dirty bomb attacks from occurring. Forward deployment of suitcase nukes was another Russian response to America's Stealth Satellite surprise attack capability. This move helped level the playing field. Given the right conditions they could pull off a decapitation attack on America.

Enter the 1990's the Soviet Union was defeated by United States. The Chicago Boys in all their wisdom convinced the Russian Oligarchs to implement economic reforms that ended up killing millions of people in Russia and other former Soviet States. In the Spring of 1995 reports of loose suitcase nuclear weapons began circulate. This was a response the savage destruction that the so called reforms brought about because when you kill millions of people, some of their surviving relatives want to strike back. 

The Russians deployed suitcase nukes to Western Europe and America in the 1970's. They then began to publicly threaten to use them via "proxies" in the 1990's.

Suitcase nukes reveal there is a proxy war. It is highly unlikely that Russians would be so crazy as to sell or give over nuclear weapons to people they had no control over. They would never do that. The thing is though. They cannot openly use a suitcase nuke in a decapitation attack without risking full scale nuclear war. They need the cover of muslim proxies in order to use them. The American Ruling Class has no choice but to play into this narrative for the same reasons. A full scale nuclear war is unacceptable but a suitcase nuke attack will be sustainable.

NOTES
Lebed the Russian General was the first to put the suitcase nuke story out in the media.

30 July 2017
Lebed was assassinated. That is pretty clear. He was too much of a hardliner for Putin's liking.

Also the suitcase nuclear weapon is clearly a move to create parity. It was a response or counter move to America's dominance in space. It means that even if America conducts a preemptive strike i.e. surprise attack from space wiping out Russia; they will still lose their major cities in a suitcase nuclear attack. The Soviet capitulation clear means that American policymakers were undeterred by the Russian moves and were willing to sacrifice American cities in order to win a nuclear war.

THE USE OF CRIMINALS FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES.

CHERNOBYL: A U.S. SPECIAL FORCES TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE U.S.S.R.

The pertinent facts support this conclusion.

CIA PROPAGANDA LINES NOW ON THE JOE ROGAN EXPERIENCE

Joe Rogan recently had on Henry Rollins. The show got interesting when Rollins decided to spin a tall tale about his North Korean vacation. He claims that he was repeatedly questioned about his occupation by his two “tour spies.” According to Rollins one of the “spies” was supposedly curious when Rollins was repeatedly asked for photos by fellow tourists. This story makes no sense. If his Korean minders were in anyway suspicious they could have interrogated the people who asked for photos. If the North Korean’s had any real suspicion they could have easily have run Rollin’s photo through a reverse image search using google or Tineye to find out who he was. So, he is clearly spouting lies.

In addition Rollins’ actions reveal he is lying. He decided to evade Rogan’s cross examination of his claims by quickly changing the subject to Iran another country in the cross hairs of America. The changing the subject was no accident and is a tactic used in persuasion. So Rollins has had some training in doing what he is doing. Rollins is obviously an intelligent man. His actions indicate that. His unabashed propaganda spewing shows he has no conscience. He is laying down the line to justify murdering people in North Korean and Iran.

TRUMP DOES SOMETHING I AGREE WITH HE PULLED OUT OF THE TPP.

I must say that I support President Trump's pulling out of the TPP. This is an important move. And he should get some credit for doing it.

BOB THURMAN IS A CIA PLANT