The 1979 American Overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the Roots of Islamic Terrorism


The best military policy is to attack strategies. ---Sun-Tzu

Thoughtful Americans since 9-11 have ask themselves “Why do they hate us?” the answer to this question can only be understood in the context of the history of the last Fifty years of U.S. foreign policy. The United States and the Western powers try to rule the World by not allowing other nations to develop industrially, thereby preventing the emergence of Military competitors. Therefore, the United States at every turn has pursued a foreign policy that has destabilized the political economies of those nations that challenge American power in the world or aspire to challenge American power.

The reason why they hate us is simple the U.S. has done everything in their power to keep the people of the Third World poor and in the dark through their policies of preventative industrial development in the Third World. As long as America and Europe pursue this policy, we will always be the object of world hatred. By exploring the history of O.P.E.C. and Iran in the context of Americas Cold War with the Soviet Union, one can come to understand the rise of Islamic terrorism and America’s current war in Central Asia and the Middle East.

The world paid little attention, on 9 September 1960. When five of the world’s oil producing nations came together in Baghdad for the first meeting of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or O.P.E.C. consisting of Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq and Kuwait and representing 80% of the Worlds Oil production, came to form O.P.E.C. in response to cuts in the price of crude oil. The price cuts had an adverse effect on the developing economies of newly formed international body. The formation of O.P.E.C. occurred in the atmosphere of, the European de-colonization which followed the end of World War 2, the soon to be named “Third World”, by the Western European Powers, mainly France and Great Britain. O.P.E.C. would control the price of crude oil overturning the previous economic order, which had been to the advantage of the seven major Oil companies of the West.

Initially O.P.E.C. was unsuccessful in its aim of acting unilaterally to control the price of crude. Then in response to the 1967 War, the Arab members of O.P.E.C. embarked upon their first oil embargo, cutting exports to the countries that supported Israel. The Arabs had realized since the time of Nasser that Oil was a weapon that the oil exporting nations could use to bring the West to its knees. The first Arab led embargo was short due to lack of participation by Iran and Venezuela. During this period the Shah of Iran, who was increasingly more ambitious in his plans to turn Iran into a technologically modern state on par with nations in the west, increased Iranian oil production reaping large profits due to the inflated price of oil caused by the embargo. The Shah’s refusal to participate in the Embargo came with increased demands on the U.S. for a higher rate of production to increase his revenue that was financing the “White Revolution” of 1963 or face Iranian participation in future Arab oil embargos.

The 1970s were a tumultuous time for the Middle East and Central Asia these two areas of the world are crucial to the international oil industry, which needs to keep the Suez Canal in Egypt open so the oil tankers can bring their cargo west. The Middle East witnessed the Yom Kipper War, which threatened the Suez Canal. Central Asia saw the rise of its first nuclear power India, which tested its first nuclear weapon in what it called a “Peaceful Nuclear Explosion” in order to stay within the International Non Proliferation Treaty.

During the Oct 1973- Mar 1974 oil embargo the Shah like he had in 1967 refused to take part. The Shah went on a shopping spree, with the dollars he earned by bucking the embargo, for arms. The Shah’s arms expenditures would come to the attention of U.S. foreign policy makers, which viewed them as a threat to U.S. national security. The Shah’s expenditures on conventional arms eventually gave Iran the fourth most powerful military in the world.

The Shahs military ambitions did not stop at procuring the finest conventional weapon systems that money could buy. He had nuclear ambitions as well. On the coast of Iran, the Shah was constructing with the help of Siemen’s Corporation of Germany the first of 23-planed nuclear reactors. The Shah ostensibly promoted nuclear power for the peaceful purpose of developing Iran’s industrial base. Meanwhile the Shah was covertly procuring the necessary equipment to enrich uranium. In a report entitled NonproliferationIssues HearingsBefore The Subcommittee on Arms Control, International Organizationsand Security Agreements Of The Committee on Foreign Relations UnitedStates Senate Ninety Fourth Congress it was estimated that Iran would be producing enough plutonium to produce 800 atom bombs a year by 1985. The shah’s nuclear program was progressing at a time when American foreign policy makers were increasingly concerned about nuclear proliferation. India had tested nuclear weapons. The region of Central Asia or the area of the Indian subcontinent had gone nuclear and Iran was not too far behind. U.S. foreign policy circles viewed the proliferation of nuclear weapons as cancer that was spreading west from India into the Persian Gulf. If the countries of the Persian Gulf had gone nuclear, the ability for the United States Military to intervene in the region would have been nullified.

The 1973-1974 Oil embargo had lead the American Government to threaten to use “tactical nuclear weapons” and food embargos, the carrot and stick approach, to force the Arab nations to keep the oil flowing west. The successful use of oil as a weapon by the Arab nations was as an “energy crisis” in the minds of the western powers. By 1975 a year after both Iran and Iraq embarked upon their nuclear programs, the U.S. Government drafted plans, which were published in U.S.,Congress, Committee on International Relations, Special Subcommitteeon Investigations, OilFields as Military Objectives: A Feasibility Study,Report Prepared by the Congressional Research Service, 94th Cong.,1st sess., August 21, 1975, (Washington, DC: US Government PrintingOffice, 1975), Parts I and II, pp. 1-39. to invade the oil fields Persian Gulf. An examination of America’s legislation and diplomatic maneuvers from that period reveals that the oil barons that run United States were gravely concerned that their foreign oil concessions would be nationalized by governments inimical to the USA‘s imperial designs on their lands. Both Iran and Iraq were simultaneously developing nuclear reactor complexes, which were set to go online by the early 1980’s giving U.S. foreign policy planners a window of five to ten years to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons into the Persian Gulf and preserve their ability to intervene militarily without going to nuclear war.

Tensions between the Shah and the West also grew during this period. The arms sales that the had been approved by the Nixon administration came under the scrutiny of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the Shah had bought the most sophisticated front line fighter aircraft of the U.S. Navy the F-14. The Shah of Iran single handedly saved the whole F-14 program by giving Grumman the capital needed to put the F-14 into production. The Shah’s government was a bribed by Rockwell, a company with deep CIA ties into installing a massive electronic monitoring system called IBEX, which means mountain goat in Farsi. Three Rockwell representatives were gunned down at the Tehran airport.

The U.S. mass media has long promoted a big lie in regards to the Shah namely that the United States controlled the Shah like a puppet. The Shah did not seem to share this sentiment in his book he wrote that the Western Powers had decided to overthrow him. The Shah in his book Answer to History contradicts this often-repeated lie that the West, which was once the case for the Shah of 1953 but no longer applied to the Shah of the 1970’s, supported him. The Shah believed that he was overthrown.

After being repeatedly asked to step-down by “foreign visitors” in December of 1978 visited him including Lord George Brown a former British Foreign Secretary who asked him to step down personally at this time as well. Former U.S. attorney General Ramsey Clark had a meeting with the Shah. There was considerable international pressure on the Shah to step down. Since the Shah would not step down the U.S. plotted to overthrow the Shah in a coup coordinated by General Robert Huyser, Deputy Commander of U.S. Forces in Europe. Huyser corrupted General Ghara-Baghi who according to the Shah “used his authority to prevent military action against Khomeini.” With the sole exception of Ghara-Baghi, all of the Shahs Generals faced the executioner’s hands.

The coup put the Islamic Fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini in power, a man who publicly expressed enmity to the United States. Behind the scenes the Ayatollah was a puppet who did the bidding of his Western masters. He ended Iran’s nuclear program under the ruse that it was un-Islamic, executed 200 members Iran’s Tudeh party after having been provided a list of all known Tudeh Party members from the CIA (Washington Post, 1/13/1987, A1, 8) and cooperated with then Vice Presidential Candidate George H.W. Bush to hold off on releasing the U.S. Embassy hostages in order to influence the presidential election of 1980(The October Surprise,Barbara Honegger). The Baathist Party of Iraq was also put into power with the help of the CIA. They rounded up and eliminated communists from a list provided to them by the CIA as well. (Cockburn, A. and Cockburn, L. (1991). Dangerous Liaison, p.130).

The most transparent connection between the U.S. government and Islamic Fundamentalist Terror was the U.S. backing of the Afghan Mujahedeen, which helped to defeat the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The awful truth about the rise of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is that it owes its existence to the United States and which continues to support it. All of this support was done in the name of the Cold War. The US Oil run Government supported the rise of Islamic Fundamentalist Parties and Factions in the 1970’s in order to derail scientific secular regimes in the long term and to provide a rationale for intervention in the region. The Shah had booby trapped his oil fields in the 1973-74 embargo. The US foreign policy circles knew that Americans would not support intervention to stop an oil embargo.

30 December 2017
It is clear that the American Ruling Class supports Islamic Fundamentalism because of the crucial role it has played in destabilizing the Soviet Union. These fundamentalists were used in a proxy war in Afghanistan that spread to Caucus Region of the USSR. This war lasted nearly 20 years in Russian state of Chechnya.

Islamic Fundamentalism hinders scientific progress in the countries they control. This makes the region much easier to control for the American Ruling Class.

TIMELINE

October 1994
Project SAPPHIRE
19 January 1995
Russians take the Grozny palace.
21 January 1995
Yeltsin declares victory. The Ruble hits 4000 to the dollar. The Russians take Grozny and all of the sudden the country’s economy could collapse.
23 January 1995
German economic minister Gunther Rexrodt warns of economic strain due to Chechnya.
07 February 1995
IMF loan to Russia is in jeopardy.  
08 February 1995
Chechens give up battle for Grozny. They announce that they were pulling their military headquarters from the capital.
12 February 1995
Chechen terrorists claim they have killed 250 Russian troops.
13 February 1995
CEASEFIRE IS DECLARED.
17 February 1995
Western press declares that the Russians have breached the peace.
02 March 1995
Moscow set to sign deal with IMF.
07 March 1995
EU halts deal with Russia.
09 March 1995
MOSCOW PAYS A HIGH PRICE FOR ITS CHECHEN ADVENTURE
250k refuges scattered throughout Russia. The Guardian reports that Dudayev appears to be well funded.
10 March 1995
IMF approves 6.25 billion loans to Russia.
15 March 1995
General Dudayev threatens kamikaze attacks on Russia.
24 March 1995
HONEYMOON WITH US 'OVER' SAYS MOSCOW;
Kozyrev warns Washington against 'unfaithfulness'
Kozyrev warns of chill with US as Geneva talks fail
01 April 1995
The last Chechen terrorist town of Shali falls.
14 April 1995
Chechen leader's HQ destroyed in artillery attack
19 April 1995
RUSSIA 'READY TO USE FORCE IN EX-SOVIET STATES'
24 April 1996
DZHOKHAR DUDAYEV ALLEGEDLY KILLED. He was supposedly tracked by his cell phone.
17 August 1998
Russian Ruble collapses.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS NEUTRON BOMB 911

ABC News

September 13, 2001 Thursday

SHOW: World News Tonight (6:30 PM ET) - ABC

PETER JENNINGS, anchor:

There are a great many missing in New York City and ABC's George Stephanopoulos is downtown where he has been all day. Here's his report on the day and the search for the missing. George:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS reporting:

That's right, Peter. I've been walking. Now, you've talked about people walking aimlessly through lower Manhattan today. It's really a separate city of 285,000 people, and I would say it's divided into three zones. You're only allowed below 14th Street if you can show you live there, or you have a legitimate work reason to be there. And the area above Houston Street is like a pedestrian mall. There are a lot of inconveniences. You can't buy newspapers. Some of the stores are closed. But the parks are filled, people are walking around, and it's basically working at some level. Then, of course, you come to the right side of ground zero, which is just a rescue--search and rescue operation. The Lower East Side is kind of interesting, and I hope we can pick up the video here. I was carrying this little camera. It's an area now near city hall that looks like it's been hit by a neutron bomb. All the buildings are intact, but the place is abandoned…….

DOES AMERICA'S CAPITALIST SYSTEM MAKE WAR WITH RUSSIA INEVITABLE?

The American Ruling Class' international power is founded on the petrodollar. All of the petroleum producing countries in the world are more or less controlled by the United States. Russia is outside of this control. Russia controls the most of the asian continent. Undoubtedly their petroleum reserves must be well underestimated. Their oil resources are a threat to the petrodollar. America's covert war inside the Russian Federation in the Caucasus Region makes sense. The more Balkanized Russia is the more secure American power is in the world. The American Ruling Class refuses to develop alternatives to oil such as nuclear energy. In fact they have painted themselves into a corner, by having demonized nuclear technology. The ARC, if it wants to keep its power, has no choice but to pursue destabilization of Russia, further isolate it, and keep its oil off the market. 

TARGETING OF DIA AND NAVAL COMMAND CENTER SHOW IT WAS NOT BIN LADEN

Can you believe someone who flunked out of flight school did this? 

The targeting of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Navy Operations Center (NOC) shows that the 911 attacks were not an "inside job" nor were they authored by Bin Laden. This was not an inside job because the military would not have targeted their own command centers. This is not like sinking the Maine in Havana Harbor. This akin to the people who supposedly conspired to sink the Maine attacking themselves. And there is a big difference between sinking a ship in a foreign harbor and attacking your own headquarters. They could have just as easily sank an aircraft carrier in foreign waters to generate a cause for war. These offices were just recently renovated as well. What would be the motivation for them to attack themselves? These offices were deliberately targeted and the fact that they got past the Pentagon's defenses not only is an embarrassment for the American Military, it shows a great level of sophistication on the part of the attackers. Only a nation state could have pulled it off. 

The targeting of the Navy Operations Center and the DIA shows that this was not Bin Laden. He allegedly was responsible for a couple of car bombings and the bombing the U.S.S. Cole. In the period of a year he supposedly makes a great leap forward in capabilities to that of a Super Power. In fact former National Security Council members have said that the United States would have had a hard time pulling off 911. The 911 Commission never explained how Bin Laden expanded his capabilities to the extent demonstrated on 911. 

These attacks show that a nation state was the author of the 911 attacks. That nation was Russia. They are the only country with the capability and motive to have attacked on 911. Russia had an axe to grind with both the DIA and the United States Navy. The DIA is basically the direct action arm of the CIA.The DIA organized the terrorist war inside the borders of Russia. They organized the bombing of Moscow apartment buildings, killing Russian civilians while they slept. They organized the assassination attempts on Putin. They aided the Chechens who were the proxies performing these actions. The Navy on the other hand was responsible for sinking the Kursk. They then used the Kursk tragedy to embarrass Putin making him look powerless to the Russian people. The attack on the DIA and NOC was Russia killing two birds with one stone. 

THE 911 COMMISSION REPORT

The 911 Commission Report among other things was a tool for the American Ruling Class to distance themselves from their secret war in Chechnya. 

911 STATE SPONSORSHIP QUOTES

Mr. JAMES WOOLSEY (Former CIA Director):

Well, one thing that's gone wrong, Peter, I think, is that for some years now we have adopted a theory that terrorism first was likely just to be sort of a pick-up team, these loose associations of terrorists inspired, say, by the blind sheik in New York. This was the thought on the two bombings, one attempted, one real in New York back in the early '90's. And then the Clinton administration veered off into saying everything looked like it might be Osama bin Laden. It's important that we realize there is a real possibility, when you have something this devastating and well-coordinated, that THERE COULD BE STATE ACTION OF SOME SORT BEHIND IT.

Gary Sick” Director of Middle East Institute at Columbia University

"Mr. SICK: Suicide pilots, but pilots who were qualified to fly a major airplane, and I personally watched the second plane go into the trade towers and there was no flinching and no swerving; he flew right straight into it. And it was clear that no American pilot--no commercial pilot would ever have done that.

And you stop and think about the amount of time--back it up--how much time was--would have been required and the money and the organization. Let's put it this way: What if you're the president in the Cold War days, and you tell the CIA that you'd like to create a little operation in Russia, which would basically hijack four airplanes, and within a period of an hour, crash them into major sites in the Soviet Union, and you had to organize that. It would have stretched our capabilities absolutely to the limit. And yet that's what happened here today.

Mike Ackerman, head of a Miami-based security firm and a retired CIA agent:
"This is several orders of magnitude beyond anything that we've seen before. The only small comfort we can take is that it's not nuclear, not biological, not chemical weapons," Ackerman added.

"I'm sitting here in shock, and I've been dealing with this for 30 years. It stretches the imagination that even Osama bin Laden, a renegade Saudi millionaire blamed for other terrorist actions,
could do this. It begs the question of state sponsorship." 

Bernard Schecterman, professor emeritus of international
relations and Middle East studies at the University of Miami:
To penetrate airport security, for example, the terrorists probably relied on "sleepers," operatives sent to America two or

three years ago to get jobs as airport employees.

Secretary of State Warren Christopher:

"I think it may well be state-supported terrorism in some way. The pattern here is for the terrorist to do their plotting in one country, carry out their act in a second country and then flee to a third country. And what I hope for in this situation, that we will not do what we did in the Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, and that is just focus on the immediate perpetrators -- that we go deeper, drill down and find out who actually was behind this."

Sen. EDWARDS

Sen. EDWARDS: I think when--whenever we see the kind of attack we saw on the United States to--today, certainly if it were state sponsored it would be war. And I think we should treat it as an act of war.

Senator McCain:

But I--I'm--to be honest with you, Dan, I never thought that a--an operation of this sophistication and size would take place. I d--I just never did. But I don't think there's any doubt that there are countries--Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea and others--who we know engage in proliferation of--of capabilities and, from time to time, involve themselves in state-sponsored terrorism. But never did we imagine on a scale such as this.

R.P. Eddy former National Security Council Member:

I would bet dollars to doughnuts that we're going to find that whoever did do this did have state sponsorship of one degree or another.

Judith Miller Terrorism Expert: Well, I think we used to think that only a state could do something like what we saw today.

Tom Oliphant

Tom Oliphant: So it is not clear how much the people will be told today, but there is no question in my mind that particularly on this trigger of any state sponsorship, that no more tolerance probably means thinking about military responses against countries.

Mr. JOHN PARACHINI (Monterey Institute)

John Parachini is with us. He's the executive director of the Washington office of the Monterey Institute. He's writing a book about Osama bin Laden. He is the author of a report on the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993.

Mr. Parachini, first of all, what do you think about the notion that this act was so sophisticated that it might actually have been state sponsored?

Mr. JOHN PARACHINI (Monterey Institute): I think it's a good point, and it's worth thinking about.

TERRORIST EXPERT Dr. Eliot Cohen:

I would also fall back on the issue of state sponsorship. These groups simply cannot function unless they have places that they can go where they will be sheltered by the institutions of the state. In the past, Syria and Iran have been two of the leading offenders; of, course, Iraq as well. Without some kind of state protection, it's very, very hard for these organizations to ...(unintelligible). So it's going to be a question of going both after the organizations but also going really hard after the states. We've been rather unwilling in recent years to talk about countries as sponsors of state terrorism or facilitators. But that's what a number of them are and we're going to need to turn the spotlight on them. Again, I'd stress there's a difference between crime and war, and this is war.

Jurgen Storbeck, the director of Europol:
He cautioned against jumping to conclusions before the mass of evidence had been properly sifted. In an interview with The Telegraph, he said: "Bin Laden is not the automatic leader of every terrorist act carried out in the name of Islam. "It's possible that he was informed about the operation; it's even possible that he influenced it; but he's probably not the man who steered every action or controlled the detailed plan.
"As for the idea that, sitting in Afghanistan, he could have controlled the last phase of the operation is something we
should not accept without a lot of doubt." He added: "If one wants to avoid error, one must ensure that the investigation has a wide scope." This suggests that the German authorities are highly skeptical about bin Laden's role and may have uncovered evidence
pointing in a different direction. He refused to speculate on which groups might be responsible, saying "There are a lot of people with the same philosophy who may have been to bin Laden's training camps, but are not necessarily under his orders." He said Europol was giving serious consideration to claims that there was some form of state-sponsorship involved, but said there was no hard evidence to date. Europol tracks Islamic fundamentalists, drawing on sensitive information provided by all EU states as well as tip-offs from allies such as Japan, Canada and Switzerland.

THE CIA''S AFGHAN ARABS

During the Cold War the CIA trained Saudis to fight as proxies against the Russians in Afghanistan. After the Cold War these same Arabs were funnelled into Chechnya to fight the Russians within their own borders. Bin Laden was part of the arab cadre trained by the CIA. In the 1990's  Bin Laden used a trackable and tappable satellite phone. The NSA knew his whereabouts and could eavesdrop on his conversations with the phone. So, American intelligence knew his intentions and they know he was not responsible for 911. 

THE EFFECTS OF AMERICA'S REGIME CHANGE POLICY IN RUSSIA

The American Ruling Class (ARC) has a policy of regime change in Russia and in the 1990's and 2000's fought a proxy war inside the borders of Russia in the hopes of Balkanizing Russia. The ARC's goal is to dismantle Russia the same way Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union were dismantled. The war was fought in the caucuses mainly in Chechnya. The Russians have not just looked the other way on this. The Russians have been fighting back. They have attacked inside the United States a number of times. WTC-93 bombing, OKC Bombing, and 911 were all Russian retaliation for American proxy attacks in their country. All of them used nuclear demolition devices. The Russian’s used cached nukes they put here during the Cold War or smuggled them into CONUS. These attacks were covered up by the government for political reasons.

During the Cold War both the Soviets and the Americans had programs to smuggle nuclear weapons into each other’s countries. The two books to read on the Soviet program are THE SWORD AND THE SHIELD: THE MITROKHIN ARCHIVE AND THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE KGB by Christopher Andrew and THROUGH THE EYES OF THE ENEMY by GRU defector Stanislav Lunev. Former CIA case officer, Philip Agee makes mention of the CIA program in his book CIA DIARY. The Soviet program took place sometime in the early to mid-1970’s. It was a response to the roll out of SDI that took place in the late 1960’s. The Russians have long bitterly opposed SDI and ABM systems. Cached nuclear weapons countered ABM and SDI making them useless. Miniature thermonuclear weapons can be as small as a coke can with a yield greater than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima. The Russian attacks inside CONUS in the 1990’s and 9-11 demonstrated the uselessness of these systems.

THE RUSSIAN ATTACKS INSIDE CONUS

In the WTC-93 bombing the whole presidential motorcade including the limousine was vaporized, two days before Clinton was to be riding in the limo to a speech he was to give at Rutgers. The Russians thereby demonstrated that they can assassinate the president whenever they want. In the succeeding years the Secret Service would at least double the armor on the presidential limo. The FBI never scientifically identified the bomb used in the WTC 95 bombing. This was admitted by Office of Inspector General in response to a complaint filed by Fred Whitehurst of the FBI crime lab. The FBI findings in the Oklahoma City Bombing were also fabricated according to the same OIG report.

The OKC bombing took place a few months after the CIA infiltrated Afghan-Arabs and billions of dollars of arms into Chechnya. In January of 1995 the CIA proxies handed the Russian Military an embarrassing defeat in Grozny destroying over 50 Russian tanks, in the battle for the Grozny train station. In April of 95 Russian generals were warning that they did not have control of their "tactical" nuclear weapons. America then gets hit at OKC on 19 April 1995. The Russian message was pretty clear. They showed us they can strike anywhere in the CONUS with nuclear weapons. 911 was retaliation for the CIA’s continued use of Chechen proxy attacks inside Russia and the torpedoing of the Kursk by the U.S.S. Memphis. The Kursk was hit by a Mark 48 torpedo at 10:28:23 on the morning of 12 August 2000.

The Russians struck twice to avenge the Kursk. They attacked the USS Cole on 12 October 2000 and they struck the Navy’s New Pentagon Command Center the morning of 911. 9-11 took place exactly a year to the date of the CIA’s bombings of Russian apartment buildings in Moscow. The necessary logistics of the 911 attacks show that it was not; nor could it have possibly been authored Bin Laden. The fact that the attack took out the Navy’s command center shows that to be the case. It is also notable that the North Tower goes down at 10:28 am. This is to the minute the time the Kursk was torpedoed. The attackers (Russians) also jammed Air Force One’s secure communications forcing the President to land in order to securely communicate with Washington D.C. again showing that it could not have possibly been Bin Laden.

23 November 2002 BUSH’S SUMMIT WITH PUTIN IN ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA.

23 November 2002 

BUSH’S SUMMIT WITH PUTIN IN ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA. 

Putin’s seemingly tepid support of Bush’s Iraq invasion was ultimately self-serving. The war in Iraq would raise the price of oil boosting Russian GDP. Putin also rubbed shit in Bush’s face during the St. Petersburg meeting, by calling attention to the lie that fifteen of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. Putin was pushing Bush in the direction of increasing the tensions between America and its vassals in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Both of them knew that Saudi Arabia was not responsible for the attacks of 9-11. Both of them knew that Russia had attacked America. Bush who had gone into his presidency promising a hardline on Russia was now saying publically how he had looked into Putin’s eyes and saw his soul. This was a 180 degree reversal in his rhetoric. Of course this did not stop Bush from ramping up a war in Chechnya, his support for terrorist attacks on Russian civilians or CIA sponsored assassination attempts on Putin, because it was all rhetorical. 

9-11 PROXY WAR : THE RUSSIAN BOMBINGS OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSIES IN AFRICA

Russia and the United States have been in a covert proxy war since the fall of the Soviet Union. Due to America's military space program and its control of the high ground Russia more or less conducted a strategic retreat. No longer being a communist country Russia lured in American technological firms to gain their technology. The firms whose technology was most important to conducting the 9-11 terrorist attacks were Boeing, Honeywell and Raytheon. These three companies were all points of contact to conduct the espionage necessary to remotely hijack the planes on 9-11. ALL three companies were doing business with Russia prior to 9-11. 

Wanting to conquer Russia, America under the command of Bill Clinton did not relent and marched the conventional American Army to the borders of Russia. He also launched a guerilla war within Russia in the state of Chechnya. American supported Chechen terrorists hijacked planes, ferries, buses, took hostages, attacked hospitals, launched car bomb attacks and even threatened to attack Russian nuclear power plants. This secret war was conducted in much the same manner as the secret war Nixon conducted in Laos and all in the hopes that Russia would fall to pieces in much the same way the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia did. 

The embassy bombings of 07 August 1998 took place two years to the day of the Battle of Grozny 07 August 1996. These bombings were very clearly retaliation for the American attack on Russian Forces in Chechnya. In fact it can be said that ALL of the major terrorist attacks from 27 February 1993 to 11 September 2001 on U.S. assets in were blowback from the secret American policy of covert war within the borders of Russia. Russia started using suitcase nukes on American targets in the 1990's with the 27 February 1993 attacks on the World Trade Center. The WTC-93 bombing was by all accounts a very sophisticated attack, taking out the presidential motorpool, severing the power lines of the WTC and damaging the subway terminal beneath the center. The FBI's crime lab never found chemical residues proving the bomb was urea nitrate. 

The tarps placed over the epicenter of the OKC bombing were put there to cover up the radioactive fallout from the bomb to keep it from being spread by the weather. 

The Oklahoma City Bombing was a suitcase nuclear weapon attack. The Russians struck in the heart of America. These weapons were smuggled into the United States starting sometime in the late 1960's. The Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) was founded around the same time in 1975. Soviet defector Stanislav Lunev claimed that these munitions were built in the 1970's. Bill Clinton in retaliation for the Oklahoma City Bombing approved a Chechen terrorist attack on a hospital in Budyonnovsk killing nearly the same number of people. 

The sophistication of the 9-11 attacks show that it was state sponsored. The Russians hacked the autopilots of the planes and used suitcase nuclear weapons planted inside the towers. These attacked demonstrated that while the American military might control the space of low earth orbit that does not change things on the ground. 

This Apollo third stage S-IVB designated J002E3 was first reported in the press on the first anniversary of 9-11. It had been in orbit around earth since March of 2002. It shows that the 9-11 attacks were not perpetrated by Bin Laden or Saudi Arabia. Bush was ready to go to full scale nuclear war in response to the attack of 9-11. The American military showed its hand and how they intend to conduct a nuclear war in 2002. Russia is the only reason they would play this card. 

The Budyonnovsk hospital hostage crisis was American Retaliation for the Oklahoma City Bombing

The United States and Russia have been engaged in a proxy war since the Fall of the Soviet Union. The United States ran their armies right up to the borders of Russia and sponsored Nazi terrorists to kill Russians in Chechnya. The major attacks against America in the 90's were sponsored by Russia. 

ISLAMIC TERRORISM AND WE DID IT TO OURSELVES ARE THE COVER FOR RUSSIAN ATTACKS ON THE USA

Looking back 6 years from 11 September 2001. We see the same cover story being used for the OKC bombing that we would later see being used for 9-11. In this video the claim is made that OKC was a controlled demolition. It is also notable blame was first put on Islamic terrorists as well. They decided to go for the we did it to ourselves meme to explain what happened. This would be the same meme used in the 9-11 event. 9-11 was not an Islamic Terrorist event. It was Russian retaliation to American provocations in and around their territory. 

OKC was a suitcase nuke attack on the United States by Russia. 

In order to get out ahead of journalists who would see the inconsistencies of the official version. They had to explain how a bomb that could not have destroyed the Murrah Building did so. So, the government uses people like Col. Gritz to steer people in the direction and narrative they want them to believe. Initially the narrative was going to be that Islamic Jihad was the culprit for the bombing. The trouble with this narrative is that in April 1995, the Russian General Lebed had recently claimed that Chechen terrorists had recently acquired man portable nuclear weapons. The OKC blast was in the neighborhood of 40 tons of TNT. 40 tons is on the lower end of the spectrum of man portable nuclear weapons. The Soviets began prepositioning man portable nuclear weapons inside the United States sometime in the 1960's. So, the Islamic terrorist explanation had to be abandoned in order to prevent people from drawing the conclusion that a suitcase nuclear weapon had been used. 

When Lebed made his claims of loose nuclear weapons what he was really making a veiled threat that he intended to attack the United States. This attack came on 19 April 2017. The internal logic of Lebed's narrative does not hold water. It is highly unlikely that anyone could make it out of an armory with a suitcase nuclear weapon in hand. Also the Chechen terrorists were supported by the CIA. So, Lebed was saying that CIA supported terrorists would give Bin Laden also a CIA supported terrorist nuclear weapons to attack the United States. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. It is a bit much to believe. The timing of the OKC bombing suggests that a cached man portable nuclear weapon was used. The Russians showed us that they can attack within the center of the Continental United States CONUS. 

AMERICANS MURDERED GENERAL LEBED?

OKC and 911 were Russian attacks on the United States in response to American actions in Chechnya. General Lebed was the architect of these attacks.

Playing this card shows that 9-11 was not Bin Laden. 

General Lebed dies 28 days after an S-IVB third stage from an Apollo mission left its heliocentric orbit near L1 to orbit the Earth. This third stage designated J002E3 was first reported in the press on the anniversary of 9-11. In response to American actions in Chechnya Lebed had made thinly veiled threats of suitcase nuke attacks against the United States in the 1990’s. The War Colleges in America had been writing articles and papers on the prospect of super terrorist attacks not long after the fall of the Soviet Union. Beginning in the middle of the 1960's the prospect of a man portable nuclear weapons attack on America was taken seriously. The Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) was established sometime in the middle of the1970’s. Meaning that Soviet deployment of these weapons within the Continental United States (CONUS) took place sometime during this period. Lebed was threatening to use these weapons in response to American actions in Chechnya. The Russian attack on the USA did not use suitcase nuclear weapons. They used airplanes.

HOW THE USA TOOK DOWN THE SOVIET UNION

There were two cloak and dagger factors that brought down the Soviet Union. The Soviets were attacked internally by the Gehlen network of stay behind spies who remained in the Soviet Union as the Nazi Army retreated from the USSR. This was the cloak. The cloak was paired with the dagger of being militarily contained at its borders and in space. The Gehlen Network played a big role in destabilizing the country. The network played a role recently in Ukraine helping to overthrow the legitimate government. 

http://thearea51blog.blogspot.com/2015/09/hanger-18-is-where-nuclear-powered.html

RW BUSSARD'S PRESCIENT VIEWS ON OIL.

As for energy companies "stampeding" to support us -- It is clear that a view like this is ignorant of the reality of energy companies. There is only one thing the oil companies want, and that is to sell oil, and more oil. So long as the fields pump, the oil companies will squeeze. They have NO, absolutely NO interest in anything new, ins spite of all their foolish ads in magazines for wind mills and solar-PV roofs. It is all just show and tell. I know these guys, and there is no way they would support anything that might get in the way of oil. The only way to stop oil, from their view, is when it does run out. And then they''ll go for deeper drilling, new fields, Gulf geopressure gas, LNG, etc, etc, and keep raising the price, until finally foolish solar and windmills become competitive.
And we are paying the equivalent of $ 500/bbl oil costs. But Exxon and Halliburton are getting richer all the time.
Yes, we would like to build the demo plant, and yes, it will cost about 150 (DD) to 200 M (pB11), and who knows if any investor singly or a group can or will come up with the money. One of the biggest obstacle is the world-wide tokamak lobby, which perpetuates the fraud that Hirsch, Trivelpiece and I foisted on the country in the 1970's when we started the big tokamak ball rolling.
Magnetic confinement fusion is a misnomer, as magnetic fields can NOT confine a plasma, only constrain its motion towards walls. The entire history of the MagConf program has been to reduce transport to neo-classical (not turbulent or instability-driven) losses. And THEN the machines are all inherently and inevitably huge and cost too much and make too much power to ever be economically useful --- as the utilities have been telling the AEC/DoE for 30 years. No matter, the global tokamak program provides jobs for hundreds of thousands of people in many countries, and is a safe place to put political pork funding, simply because it IS NO THREAT TO OIL - it won't ever work, but it sounds good to the untutored public.

.......

I believe that the survival of our high-tech civilizations depends on getting off of fossile fuels ASAP, and - if we do not - we will descend into a growing series of "oil wars" and energy confrontations that can lead only to a huge cataclysim. Which CAN be circumvented if only we build the clean fuison machines in time. Our patents are in final form, and I am giving a paper in the Fall, and trying to get a large technical description together for a major paper by summer. We shall see.
One final word: Actually our device is really not a variant of Farnwworth/Hirsch, but of Elmore/Tuck/Watson who propeosed the inversion of Farnsworth/Hirsch long ago (ca. 1967). Their problem was the interception of circulating electrons by grids - we removed the grids and replaced them by B field insulated coils - thus our "grids" are the coils themselves.. And we do know how these work, at last.

http://www.rexresearch.com/bussard/bussard.htm

AN ECONOMIC BILL OF RIGHTS

The so called liberals in this country need to get behind President Roosevelt's proposal for an economic bill of rights. The problem is that the Democratic Party in America stands for nothing. The need to show the world that they actually stand for something and will expand upon what has traditionally made them "liberal" namely the New Deal and Great Society programs of the 20th Century.

AUTHORITARIANISM AND PROFESSIONALISM

One sign that you are living in a totalitarian / authoritarian society is the existence of professionals. The profession that most associated with totalitarianism is that of lawyer. In the ancient democratic state of Athens there were no lawyers. Every citizen had the responsibility of knowing the law. In totalitarian states the laws are purposefully Byzantine in order to repress the people. The lay citizen is ignorant of the majority of the laws, yet is expected to adhere to the law. The United States was founded on the constitution of Rome. There were some tweaks but this is more or less the truth. The Roman Constitution was instituted in order to protect the institution of slavery. It is a constitutional oligarchic system. It is the antithesis of freedom. More to come....

THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT IS ILLEGITIMATE.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/feds-arrest-nsa-contractor-leak-top-secret-russia-document-n768561

With the recent arrest of NSA contractor "Reality Leigh Winner", an obvious pseudonym, it now looks like America's voting machines were hacked. This now stands in stark contradiction to the previous assertions that the machines were "unhackable." If the machines were hacked and they probably were, then the government of the United States of America is illegitimate. So while everyone is mesmerized by the Comey revelations. The real news is being passed over. The real news is the American Political System is illegitimate.

"The Assad Regime is a Moral Disgrace": Noam Chomsky on Ongoing Syrian War

Chomsky clearly supports the Syrian Intervention. He has supported American Military interventions into Yugoslavia in the 1990's. Chomsky is old enough and educated enough to know how these interventions are done. The Syrian intervention has followed the same script America has been using since the days of the OSS. America inserts Special Forces soldiers and arms into a country. The Special Forces soldiers train locals to use the weapons and lead them to overthrow the government. The U.S. did this all over Western Europe in during WW2. They parachuted arms and OSS soldiers into Western Europe to fight the Nazis. The French Resistance is the most famous example of this. During the Cold War America stuck to the script using it all over the world in counter insurgency or what Special Forces calls Foreign Internal Defense (FID). The Bay of Pigs is the most infamous example of this strategy. I suggest that anyone reading this peruse the CIA documents on the Bay of Pigs. The script for running these kind of interventions is revealed there.

Chomsky’s authority as a “dissident” is being used to justify the American takeover of Syria. When he calls Assad’s regime “moral disgrace” without giving the pertinent background facts as to why there is a civil war, he is supporting American hegemony in the region. Also Chomsky is a farce. He represents the pale of respectable opinion in America. The American Ruling Class control over the media is totalitarian in nature. Chomsky is clearly a CIA asset/agent. Not only does his stands on key issues make this clear the company he keeps says it as well. He is friends with former CIA Director John M. Deutch.  The fact that he kept his job at MIT also speaks to this fact. If Chomsky were a real threat he would have been gone long ago. There is a long history of intellectuals being used by the CIA/OSS. Philosophers like Bertrand Russell and AJ Ayer worked for the CIA in the 1940’s. They were part of the Non-Communist Left that the CIA cultivated during the Cold War. Chomsky a self-described “anarchist” clearly falls into this class. So, know when you are listening to Chomsky, you are listening to a CIA agent, who has been groomed and cultivated to be your official lefty dissident. His perception as being left gives him persuasive power not only over others that like him but even more over the people that hate him. The conservatives that listen to him are even more persuaded of Assad’s immorality having heard Chomsky deride the man.

Democracy Now and Radio Pacifica are also CIA; they receive money from the same corporations that fund the mainstream media. Except they get it through the backdoor of their “philanthropic foundations.” These foundations are used to cloak CIA funding. Amy Goodman and Alan Nairn made their bones covering East Timor. Nairn has admitted publicly that in order to save his life at the hand of his Indonesian captors. He revealed to them that he is an Office of Naval Intelligence Officer. Intelligence Officers work in pairs or teams which means that Goodman is also an agent.

The CIA is a big tent organization (just don’t be a communist). Chomsky, Goodman and Nairn are a testament to that. So, don’t be fooled when you watch Democracy Now, know that you are watching the "left-wing" mouth pieces of our totalitarian ruling class. Assad’s self-defense casus belli is just. And Chomsky should know that. Instead he chooses to support American Intervention in Syria. 

Suitcase Nukes and the case for the American / Russian proxy war

The suitcase nuclear weapons story shows there is a proxy war. The Americans started the war in the 70's using Afghan and Iranian muslims to overthrow their governments. No doubt that two can play that game. The Russians now have their proxies as well.

The 1970's saw the creation in America of the Nuclear Emergency Search Team. This secret team was tasked with preventing suitcase nuke and dirty bomb attacks from occurring. Forward deployment of suitcase nukes was another Russian response to America's Stealth Satellite surprise attack capability. This move helped level the playing field. Given the right conditions they could pull off a decapitation attack on America.

Enter the 1990's the Soviet Union was defeated by United States. The Chicago Boys in all their wisdom convinced the Russian Oligarchs to implement economic reforms that ended up killing millions of people in Russia and other former Soviet States. In the Spring of 1995 reports of loose suitcase nuclear weapons began circulate. This was a response the savage destruction that the so called reforms brought about because when you kill millions of people, some of their surviving relatives want to strike back. 

The Russians deployed suitcase nukes to Western Europe and America in the 1970's. They then began to publicly threaten to use them via "proxies" in the 1990's.

Suitcase nukes reveal there is a proxy war. It is highly unlikely that Russians would be so crazy as to sell or give over nuclear weapons to people they had no control over. They would never do that. The thing is though. They cannot openly use a suitcase nuke in a decapitation attack without risking full scale nuclear war. They need the cover of muslim proxies in order to use them. The American Ruling Class has no choice but to play into this narrative for the same reasons. A full scale nuclear war is unacceptable but a suitcase nuke attack will be sustainable.

NOTES
Lebed the Russian General was the first to put the suitcase nuke story out in the media.

30 July 2017
Lebed was assassinated. That is pretty clear. He was too much of a hardliner for Putin's liking.

Also the suitcase nuclear weapon is clearly a move to create parity. It was a response or counter move to America's dominance in space. It means that even if America conducts a preemptive strike i.e. surprise attack from space wiping out Russia; they will still lose their major cities in a suitcase nuclear attack. The Soviet capitulation clear means that American policymakers were undeterred by the Russian moves and were willing to sacrifice American cities in order to win a nuclear war.

THE USE OF CRIMINALS FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES.

CHERNOBYL: A U.S. SPECIAL FORCES TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE U.S.S.R.

The pertinent facts support this conclusion.

CIA PROPAGANDA LINES NOW ON THE JOE ROGAN EXPERIENCE

Joe Rogan recently had on Henry Rollins. The show got interesting when Rollins decided to spin a tall tale about his North Korean vacation. He claims that he was repeatedly questioned about his occupation by his two “tour spies.” According to Rollins one of the “spies” was supposedly curious when Rollins was repeatedly asked for photos by fellow tourists. This story makes no sense. If his Korean minders were in anyway suspicious they could have interrogated the people who asked for photos. If the North Korean’s had any real suspicion they could have easily have run Rollin’s photo through a reverse image search using google or Tineye to find out who he was. So, he is clearly spouting lies.

In addition Rollins’ actions reveal he is lying. He decided to evade Rogan’s cross examination of his claims by quickly changing the subject to Iran another country in the cross hairs of America. The changing the subject was no accident and is a tactic used in persuasion. So Rollins has had some training in doing what he is doing. Rollins is obviously an intelligent man. His actions indicate that. His unabashed propaganda spewing shows he has no conscience. He is laying down the line to justify murdering people in North Korean and Iran.

TRUMP DOES SOMETHING I AGREE WITH HE PULLED OUT OF THE TPP.

I must say that I support President Trump's pulling out of the TPP. This is an important move. And he should get some credit for doing it.

BOB THURMAN IS A CIA PLANT

RUSSIAN HACKING

RUSSIAN HACKING

Accusations of Russian hacking of the American 2016 presidential election are a hot topic in the news. Americans are divided on whether these accusations are true. Some on the left reject the accusations out of hand. Some on the right, mainly Trump supporters, dismiss the accusations out of hand as “excuses.” The hacking allegations are not implausible. Here’s why.

Given the fact that the USA intervened in the Russian elections of the 1990’s, to say that the Russians hacked the U.S. election is not an implausible claim. At the moment we simply cannot say one way or the other, if they did, until we see the actual evidence. VP Biden swore there would be revenge for the hacking. The billion ruble hack of the Russian Central Bank, I believe, was that revenge. If the Dems were not hacked by Russia, then why go on television and say we are going to hack you back?

The establishment does not want to get too deep into woods on this issue. They want to attack Trump’s legitimacy without bringing into question the legitimacy of the whole system. When one examines the legitimacy of the system, if we posit that the President is a representative elected by all of the voting age people, then it becomes apparent there has never been a legitimate president. 

The legitimacy of the whole American Electoral System is in question. Why is there not a direct democratic vote for President? Why are machines capable of being hacked being used at all?

Half of the voting age population in America does not even come out to vote. This fact alone undermines the very principle of representative government. Our representation is not representative of all the voting age population and no effective reforms are being taken to increase voter turnout.

Then there are the gerrymandered congressional districts designed to keep conservatives in office. And there are the various barriers erected to keep people from even coming to the polls. There is no national voting holiday. Ex-convicts who are mostly poor have been disenfranchised. America is far from being a functional representative democracy. No one in the media will even point it out.

No one in the media is asking these questions.

The following reforms would be prudent:

1.   Amend the constitution making voting a right.

2.   Amend the constitution abolishing the Electoral College.

3.   Amend the constitution to make election days a holiday.

4.   Amend the constitution to end the disenfranchisement of convicts which effects the poor and working class.

5.   Amend the constitution to ban voting machines. Hand counted paper ballots will be the preferred method.

6.   Amend the constitution to end gerrymandering.

7.   Amend the constitution giving voters a tax refund for going to the polls and voting.

Trump by deciding to live in an ill protected in Manhattan penthouse apartment is making himself an easy target for a foreign decapitation attack utilizing a suitcase nuclear weapon. His hubris is legion and will give the Russians parity something they have never had in their dealings with America.