Saturday, 24 October 2015
Sunday, 18 October 2015
HOW SOVEREIGN IS CHINA OVER THEIR OWN DEVELOPMENT?
China Details Next-Gen Nuclear Reactor Program
China, in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, says it will deploy advanced nuclear reactors commercially by 2030.
By Richard Martin on October 16, 2015
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/542526/china-details-next-gen-nuclear-reactor-program/#comments
This story from MIT has me wondering; how sovereign is China over its own development? Why does China have to collaborate with the American Department of Energy in order to develop LFTR? They have plenty of talented engineers and physicists that should be able to develop the technology on their own. It appears as though the Chinese have American minders to make sure the technology is not developed for the military applications that the United State developed these reactors for in the first place.
I am skeptical as to whether or not the Chinese will ever bring this technology to market. If it takes 15 years to make this a reality, it is probably not going to happen. This story also reminds me of the program to buy up the plutonium and uranium from Soviet warheads that the DOE set up with Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Depending on the degree to which this program has disarmed Russia the sovereignty of Russia must also come into question.
The American ruling class created and demonstrated a first strike capability in the 1950's. This is what the U-2 and B-57 overflight program of the 1950's showed the Soviets. It was a psychological warfare campaign. It let the Soviet ruling class know that they could experience a Pearl Harbor at any moment. I believe this capability has been maintained and has the Russians cowed to a certain extent.
China, in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, says it will deploy advanced nuclear reactors commercially by 2030.
By Richard Martin on October 16, 2015
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/542526/china-details-next-gen-nuclear-reactor-program/#comments
This story from MIT has me wondering; how sovereign is China over its own development? Why does China have to collaborate with the American Department of Energy in order to develop LFTR? They have plenty of talented engineers and physicists that should be able to develop the technology on their own. It appears as though the Chinese have American minders to make sure the technology is not developed for the military applications that the United State developed these reactors for in the first place.
I am skeptical as to whether or not the Chinese will ever bring this technology to market. If it takes 15 years to make this a reality, it is probably not going to happen. This story also reminds me of the program to buy up the plutonium and uranium from Soviet warheads that the DOE set up with Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Depending on the degree to which this program has disarmed Russia the sovereignty of Russia must also come into question.
The American ruling class created and demonstrated a first strike capability in the 1950's. This is what the U-2 and B-57 overflight program of the 1950's showed the Soviets. It was a psychological warfare campaign. It let the Soviet ruling class know that they could experience a Pearl Harbor at any moment. I believe this capability has been maintained and has the Russians cowed to a certain extent.
Wednesday, 14 October 2015
How Chris Hedges Shows He Is A CIA Plant
The position that the American so called "far left" has taken against Bernie Sanders reveals the level to which "the left" has been corrupted and penetrated by the forces Marx warned us about in the Communist Manifesto. "A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies." Presbyterian Minister Chris Hedges is the personification of the "German police-spies" aspect of this "holy alliance." I find it interesting that Hedges wants to define what it means to be a socialist in terms of the position one takes on issues that are at best tangential to working class struggle.
Hedges supports imposing a two state solution on the Palestinians along the 1967 borders when the Palestinians don't want one. Poll after poll has shown that 70 percent of Palestinians support a one state solution where democratic institutions will determine the fate of the peoples that live in land controlled by the Knesset. Hedges has cleverly made an anti-democratic argument appear to be noble. In reality it is just casting shadows on the wall. When it comes to Palestine Hedges has shown that he does not believe in democracy. He wants to dictate to the Palestinian people and force them into a non-democratic solution to the colonization of their homeland. Hedges wants you to believe that non-democratic solutions are best for the Palestine problem.
Sanders is not a perfect candidate. He is not left enough in my opinion. But he is the only candidate that wants to do something to relieve at least some of the suffering of the American working class. It is in the interest of the American working class to vote for Sanders. The fact that Hedges wants the American left to shun Sanders on the basis of tangential issues and not vote their interest is another point to consider. What is most chilling about Chris Hedges is his ability to cloak anti-democratic views in the pro-Palestine banner. I say this because Socialism at its base is a democratic movement designed to free the working class from the tyrannical yoke of the capitalist class. Hedges is exploiting the Palestine issue in the hopes of preventing the American working class from using their democratic institutions to better themselves. The fact that so many on the "left" are falling for this ruse is what is truly frightening. Chris Hedges does not care about Palestinians or the American working class.
Bibliography:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20091116_the_new_state_solution
http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/what_it_means_to_be_a_socialist_20150920
https://electronicintifada.net/content/survey-70-percent-palestinians-support-one-state-solution/6773
http://www.thetower.org/0593-poll-more-than-70-percent-of-palestinians-reject-two-state-solution/
https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/the-ordination-service-for-chris-hedges-with-cornel-west/
Saturday, 10 October 2015
America's Nuclear Scandal Six Nuclear Reactors Could Power The Whole Country
America's Nuclear Technology is so advanced that the whole of America's electrical energy needs could be met employing only 6 nuclear reactors. America's capitalist class in order to enslave the American populace keeps this technology hidden. The media never even talks about Vapor Core nuclear reactors. They have been in development since at least the mid-1950's. By 1965 the United States military had 285,000 Megawatt Vapor Core reactors for rocket propulsion. America's peak summer capacity stands at 1,063,033 Megawatts. 70 percent of a reactors thermal wattage can be turned into electricity. That means that a reactor from 1965 can produce 199,500 Megawatts of electricity. So, 6 of these reactors could be used to power the whole of the United States. Why is this not a national scandal? It's not because practically no one has ever heard about vapor core reactors and there has been a very successful nuclear demonization campaign as well. The American ruling class only wants to enslave their fellow man. That is their aim. The money you pay to the electrical companies i.e. the Rockefeller's and Koch brothers is nothing more than theft. The blood of the young and elderly that die in the summer heat is on their hands. They are the face of true evil.
09 January 2016
I just watched a youtube with Mark Lynas. He said that the world consumes 15 Terawatts of power. That means using the dimensions for the Vapor Core Rocket engine in this article, that 75 Vapor Core Reactors could power the whole of the world as it stands now.
16 January 2017
The suppression of nuclear power has set back science and human knowledge in general. If nuclear thermal rockets were utilized human beings would have a manned deep space program. We do not, because to do so would threaten the livelihood of the huge multinational energy companies. They run the world behind the scenes of the facade capitalists call "democracy." Space exploration of the solar system is 50 years behind where it should be and it is all due to the fact that nuclear power has been suppressed to the benefit the 1%. How much more would we know, if we had manned exploration of the solar system? Doubtlessly we would know heaps more about our world, if we had a manned exploration program.
Nothing beats having a manned exploration program. Nothing beats actually going to these places in person. Science and human knowledge are the victims of big energy. The suppression of nuclear power also delineates the limits of capitalist science. Science under capitalism is only worthwhile, if it increases the profits of capitalists. Scientific discoveries such as nuclear energy are a threat to the system and must be vilified. Capitalism will lead to the extinction of the human species, if it is not overthrown.
Nothing beats having a manned exploration program. Nothing beats actually going to these places in person. Science and human knowledge are the victims of big energy. The suppression of nuclear power also delineates the limits of capitalist science. Science under capitalism is only worthwhile, if it increases the profits of capitalists. Scientific discoveries such as nuclear energy are a threat to the system and must be vilified. Capitalism will lead to the extinction of the human species, if it is not overthrown.
ASHTON CARTER THREATENS RUSSIA WITH AMERICAN FALSE FLAG ISLAMIST ATTACKS
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/08/russia-pay-price-syrian-airstrikes-ashton-carter-us-defence-secretary
Ever since Russia stepped up its presence in Syria America has been making veiled threats to attack Russia using Islamic Proxies. Russia could respond in kind with suitcase nuclear weapons attacks or they could begin shooting down American planes over Syria. The Russians would not do this directly they would make it appear that the Syrians did it. All they would have to do is change the paint job on Russian equipment to make it Syrian in appearance. Or they could "mistakenly" shoot down American planes claiming "mis-identification" as the basis of the shoot down.
It is also notable that no MANPADS, shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles, have made it into the battle. There might be a gentleman's agreement between the USA and Russia not to use such weapons. America armed their Islamic Proxies with Stinger missiles in Afghanistan in the 1980's with such missiles. They shot down many Russian helicopters with these missiles. The Russians responded with a muffler that cut down the infrared signature of their choppers. If the Russians armed American domestic terrorists or drug gangs with MANPADS the American air travel system could be shutdown.
It takes about 15 seconds to deploy a Stinger. That is how long it takes a Stinger armed soldier to get out of a Humvee and fire at a plane. This is one explanation for what happened to TWA flight 800 and why it was covered up. It was shot down from a shoulder fired missile and covered up because if there are terrorists i.e. Russian proxy forces roaming the USA with Stingers that could shutdown every airport in America. I suspect unless the attacks take place in an undeniable way the American media would just cover it up as a mechanical error. Remember the TWA 800 gas tank? This is how the media attempted to deal with 9-11 until the second plane hit. If that second plane had not hit the towers it would have just been written off as a "navigational error."
We are living in interesting times. The war between Russia and the United States is back on and it is getting hotter. We the lay citizens are just the cannon fodder of our ruling class who have their bomb shelters in which to hide. Remember the reports that Warren Buffett was at NORAD during 9-11? If you are obscenely wealthy you get nothing but the best. You get to hide in a bomb shelter paid for by taxpayers while the rest of us are incinerated in the conflagration. This is the inevitable consequence of a system of organized greed.
Ever since Russia stepped up its presence in Syria America has been making veiled threats to attack Russia using Islamic Proxies. Russia could respond in kind with suitcase nuclear weapons attacks or they could begin shooting down American planes over Syria. The Russians would not do this directly they would make it appear that the Syrians did it. All they would have to do is change the paint job on Russian equipment to make it Syrian in appearance. Or they could "mistakenly" shoot down American planes claiming "mis-identification" as the basis of the shoot down.
It is also notable that no MANPADS, shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles, have made it into the battle. There might be a gentleman's agreement between the USA and Russia not to use such weapons. America armed their Islamic Proxies with Stinger missiles in Afghanistan in the 1980's with such missiles. They shot down many Russian helicopters with these missiles. The Russians responded with a muffler that cut down the infrared signature of their choppers. If the Russians armed American domestic terrorists or drug gangs with MANPADS the American air travel system could be shutdown.
It takes about 15 seconds to deploy a Stinger. That is how long it takes a Stinger armed soldier to get out of a Humvee and fire at a plane. This is one explanation for what happened to TWA flight 800 and why it was covered up. It was shot down from a shoulder fired missile and covered up because if there are terrorists i.e. Russian proxy forces roaming the USA with Stingers that could shutdown every airport in America. I suspect unless the attacks take place in an undeniable way the American media would just cover it up as a mechanical error. Remember the TWA 800 gas tank? This is how the media attempted to deal with 9-11 until the second plane hit. If that second plane had not hit the towers it would have just been written off as a "navigational error."
We are living in interesting times. The war between Russia and the United States is back on and it is getting hotter. We the lay citizens are just the cannon fodder of our ruling class who have their bomb shelters in which to hide. Remember the reports that Warren Buffett was at NORAD during 9-11? If you are obscenely wealthy you get nothing but the best. You get to hide in a bomb shelter paid for by taxpayers while the rest of us are incinerated in the conflagration. This is the inevitable consequence of a system of organized greed.
Thursday, 8 October 2015
Wednesday, 7 October 2015
MASS SHOOTINGS
So, there has been yet another mass shooting in America. I
am not shocked at all about it. It is really the inevitable consequence of what
I call the culture of death that America has nurtured since its inception. Is
it really surprising that an imperialist country that built itself upon a
foundation of genocide and slavery has this problem? These problems are not
heavily discussed in the popular culture or even history classes. It just lurks
there in the American collective unconscious. It unknowingly drives Americans
as a people. Then there is the mantra of violence that Americans inculcate
themselves with in their popular media. So, much of our literature and theatre
reinforces the narrative that violence is right, violence is good and is the
solution to all of our problems as human beings. We have all seen the movies
where a man is somehow wronged and then solves his problems through extrajudicial
means, mass murdering his way to personal justice. When you build a country on
genocide and slavery and constantly tell the people that violence is good you
cannot be surprised that mass murder results.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)